|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000naa a22000002 4500 |
001 |
1736072099 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20201021091424.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
201021s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390117
|2 doi
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1736072099
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1736072099
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Smith, Martha S.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Judges’ sentencing decisions with older offenders
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2018
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a Older offenders tend to be treated with more leniency in the criminal justice system. A number of studies show that older offenders are less likely to be incarcerated, and when they are incarcerated, are more likely to receive shorter sentences. However, to date, no research has directly examined why such leniency occurs. This study asked U.S. state trial court judges to reflect on their sentencing practices with older offenders and to rate the factors considered most important when sentencing this population. Responses were received from 212 judges. Only 31% of judges acknowledged treating older offenders with greater leniency. These judges also indicated that they predominantly rely on legal factors when making decisions about sentencing with older offenders rather than factors specifically associated with age. Only cognitive impairment was identified by judges as one of the five most important factors to consider when sentencing older offenders. These results are discussed in terms of judges’ awareness of how they weigh information to make legal decisions. The influence of judges’ age and attitudes about aging on sentencing decisions are also explored.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Older offenders
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Attitudes about aging
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Judicial decision-making
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Sentencing
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Schriver, Jennifer L.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Psychology, crime & law
|d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994
|g 24(2018), 2, Seite 105-116
|h Online-Ressource
|w (DE-627)341903574
|w (DE-600)2070124-X
|w (DE-576)27234995X
|x 1477-2744
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:24
|g year:2018
|g number:2
|g pages:105-116
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390117
|x Resolving-System
|3 Volltext
|
936 |
u |
w |
|d 24
|j 2018
|e 2
|h 105-116
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 3783481546
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1736072099
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20201021091424
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 201021||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-21-110
|c DE-627
|d DE-21-110
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-21-110
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a krub
|a krzo
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|