Don’t stop believing: the relative impact of internal alibi details on judgments of veracity
The relative impact of five alibi components on the assessment of alibi veracity was investigated using a policy-capturing methodology. Participants (N = 115) were instructed to assume the role of a homicide investigator and evaluate 32 alibis that varied on five dichotomous variables: Salaciousness...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| In: |
Psychology, crime & law
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1736003836 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201020100035.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201020s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1338700 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1736003836 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1736003836 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Keeping, Zak |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Don’t stop believing |b the relative impact of internal alibi details on judgments of veracity |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The relative impact of five alibi components on the assessment of alibi veracity was investigated using a policy-capturing methodology. Participants (N = 115) were instructed to assume the role of a homicide investigator and evaluate 32 alibis that varied on five dichotomous variables: Salaciousness; Legality; Change in Details; Superfluous Details; and Specific Details. Participants evaluated the believability of each alibi, and the likelihood of the alibi provider’s guilt. Results indicated that participants tended to disbelieve suspects when illegal or salacious behaviours were mentioned within the alibi. Few decision policies contained Change in Details, Superfluous Details, or Specific Details. The potential implications for alibi assessments during police investigations are discussed. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Alibi assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Offending | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Policing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Policy-capturing | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eastwood, Joseph |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lively, Christopher J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Snook, Brent |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Psychology, crime & law |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994 |g 23(2017), 9, Seite 899-913 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341903574 |w (DE-600)2070124-X |w (DE-576)27234995X |x 1477-2744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2017 |g number:9 |g pages:899-913 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1338700 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 23 |j 2017 |e 9 |h 899-913 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3782959655 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1736003836 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201020100035 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||