Sentencing and the iron cage: judges’ experiences with rationalization

Judicial decision-making has significant consequences for individuals, families, local communities, and social institutions. Mandatory sentencing guidelines were originally created to control disparity in the sentencing process. After years of implementation, they further embedded rationalization in...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Smith, Justin M. (Author) ; Smith, Sven (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: [2019]
In: Journal of crime and justice
Year: 2019, Volume: 42, Issue: 3, Pages: 331-349
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Sentencing Guidelines
Courts
Judicial attitudes
Rationality

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1728471796
003 DE-627
005 20200901100214.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200901s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/0735648X.2018.1515100  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1728471796 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1728471796 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Smith, Justin M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sentencing and the iron cage  |b judges’ experiences with rationalization 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Judicial decision-making has significant consequences for individuals, families, local communities, and social institutions. Mandatory sentencing guidelines were originally created to control disparity in the sentencing process. After years of implementation, they further embedded rationalization in the system, which has formalized complex processes leading to mass incarceration. However, recent court cases have made guidelines advisory rather than mandatory in some states. The purpose of this study is to examine Michigan judges’ experiences with sentencing guidelines one year after shifting from mandatory to advisory guidelines, and to examine how guidelines constrain and enable discretion in judicial decision-making. It draws upon theories of the rationalization of criminal justice organizations and past research on criminal courts. Our results show (1) guidelines serve as an influential ‘starting point,’ and frame sentencing decisions, (2) formal and substantive rationality both continue to influence sentencing, and (3) judges perceive the shift to advisory guidelines will only have minimal effects on sentencing patterns across the state. 
650 4 |a Sentencing Guidelines 
650 4 |a Courts 
650 4 |a Judicial attitudes 
650 4 |a Rationality 
700 1 |a Smith, Sven  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1170815596  |0 (DE-627)1040093566  |0 (DE-576)512582114  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of crime and justice  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1984  |g 42(2019), 3, Seite 331-349  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)654743452  |w (DE-600)2599262-4  |w (DE-576)352346353  |x 2158-9119  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g pages:331-349 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2018.1515100  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3745545192 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1728471796 
LOK |0 005 20200901100215 
LOK |0 008 200901||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw