A test of the predictive validity of hypothetical intentions to offend
Researchers commonly use hypothetical intentions to offend as proxies for real-world offending behavior. The current study examined the predictive validity of these hypothetical intentions, as well as the consequences of using offending intentions in statistical models of decision-making. Undergradu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal of crime and justice
Year: 2018, Volume: 41, Issue: 2, Pages: 136-154 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727787986 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200826091800.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200826s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/0735648X.2016.1244486 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727787986 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727787986 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Exum, Myron Lyn |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1068490004 |0 (DE-627)820304050 |0 (DE-576)185226086 |4 aut | |
109 | |a Exum, Myron Lyn |a Exum, M. Lyn | ||
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A test of the predictive validity of hypothetical intentions to offend |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Researchers commonly use hypothetical intentions to offend as proxies for real-world offending behavior. The current study examined the predictive validity of these hypothetical intentions, as well as the consequences of using offending intentions in statistical models of decision-making. Undergraduate students were asked to self-report their intentions to cheat on a hypothetical online exam for which they were unprepared. Minutes later, they completed a difficult online trivia test for course credit. Students who performed well on the trivia test were presumed to have cheated. Hypothetical intentions to cheat were found to predict actual cheating at a rate no better than chance. Furthermore, while several factors were found to be predictive of hypothetical cheating, none were predictive of actual cheating. This incongruence between intentions and behavior may be attributed to the different emotional reactions evoked by hypothetical and real-world offending opportunities. Implications for research on offender decision-making are discussed. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Criminal decision-making | |
650 | 4 | |a Hypothetical scenarios | |
650 | 4 | |a Intentions to offend | |
650 | 4 | |a Predictive Validity | |
700 | 1 | |a Layana, M. Cristina |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of crime and justice |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1984 |g 41(2018), 2, Seite 136-154 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)654743452 |w (DE-600)2599262-4 |w (DE-576)352346353 |x 2158-9119 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:136-154 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2016.1244486 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3742823108 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727787986 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200826091800 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200826||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |