Improving Judicial Administration Through Implementation of an Automated Sentencing Guidelines System

To ensure public trust and confidence, courts must routinely examine the management of their operations and continuously explore improvement opportunities. Although technology can be a catalyst for improving judicial administration, without the requisite planning, organizational capital (e.g., peopl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fox, Danielle P. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Najaka, Stacy Brooke ; Soulé, David A. ; Yamagata, Hisashi
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2018
En: Criminal justice policy review
Año: 2018, Volumen: 29, Número: 5, Páginas: 489-504
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Courts
Judicial administration
Program evaluation
Sentencing policy
Descripción
Sumario:To ensure public trust and confidence, courts must routinely examine the management of their operations and continuously explore improvement opportunities. Although technology can be a catalyst for improving judicial administration, without the requisite planning, organizational capital (e.g., people, process, and system alignment), and evaluation it is unlikely that such initiatives will be sustained let alone succeed. In 2012, a local circuit court in Maryland implemented the Maryland Automated Guidelines System (MAGS) developed by the Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy to electronically initiate, complete, and submit sentencing guidelines worksheets. This study discusses the evaluation of MAGS implementation, highlighting the value of technology and monitoring as a means to enhance judicial administration.
ISSN:1552-3586
DOI:10.1177/0887403416628603