Improving Judicial Administration Through Implementation of an Automated Sentencing Guidelines System
To ensure public trust and confidence, courts must routinely examine the management of their operations and continuously explore improvement opportunities. Although technology can be a catalyst for improving judicial administration, without the requisite planning, organizational capital (e.g., peopl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| In: |
Criminal justice policy review
Year: 2018, Volume: 29, Issue: 5, Pages: 489-504 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1726221423 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200805084019.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200805s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0887403416628603 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1726221423 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1726221423 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fox, Danielle P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Improving Judicial Administration Through Implementation of an Automated Sentencing Guidelines System |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a To ensure public trust and confidence, courts must routinely examine the management of their operations and continuously explore improvement opportunities. Although technology can be a catalyst for improving judicial administration, without the requisite planning, organizational capital (e.g., people, process, and system alignment), and evaluation it is unlikely that such initiatives will be sustained let alone succeed. In 2012, a local circuit court in Maryland implemented the Maryland Automated Guidelines System (MAGS) developed by the Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy to electronically initiate, complete, and submit sentencing guidelines worksheets. This study discusses the evaluation of MAGS implementation, highlighting the value of technology and monitoring as a means to enhance judicial administration. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Najaka, Stacy Brooke |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1038872693 |0 (DE-627)766623785 |0 (DE-576)18464237X |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Soulé, David A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yamagata, Hisashi |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminal justice policy review |d London : Sage, 1986 |g 29(2018), 5, Seite 489-504 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)33150796X |w (DE-600)2051883-3 |w (DE-576)094502471 |x 1552-3586 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2018 |g number:5 |g pages:489-504 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0887403416628603 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 29 |j 2018 |e 5 |h 489-504 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3735608698 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1726221423 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200805083321 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200805||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Courts | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Sentencing policy | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Program evaluation | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Judicial administration | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||