Does Collective Efficacy Matter at the Micro Geographic Level?: Findings from a Study Of Street Segments
Many scholars argue that collective efficacy is not relevant to understanding crime at the microgeographic level. We examine variation in collective efficacy across streets with different levels of crime in Baltimore City, MD, and, then, employ multilevel modelling to assess this relationship. We fi...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Beteiligte: | ; |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
2020
|
In: |
The British journal of criminology
Jahr: 2020, Band: 60, Heft: 4, Seiten: 873-891 |
Online-Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Schlagwörter: |
Zusammenfassung: | Many scholars argue that collective efficacy is not relevant to understanding crime at the microgeographic level. We examine variation in collective efficacy across streets with different levels of crime in Baltimore City, MD, and, then, employ multilevel modelling to assess this relationship. We find that people who live in crime hot spots have much lower levels of collective efficacy than people who live in non-hot spot streets and that this relationship persists when controlling for a large number of potential confounders both at the street and community levels. These findings suggest the importance of collective efficacy both in understanding and controlling crime at microgeographic units. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1464-3529 |
DOI: | 10.1093/bjc/azaa007 |