RT Article
T1 Which PCL-R Scores Best Predict Forensic Clinicians’ Opinions of Offender Risk?
JF Criminal justice and behavior
VO 45
IS 9
SP 1404
OP 1419
A1 Gardner, Brett O.
A2 Murrie, Daniel C. 1974-
A2 Boccaccini, Marcus T.
LA English
YR 2018
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1702037797
AB The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) is widely used in assessments of violence risk and sexual recidivism risk. Research consistently reveals Factor 2 (Lifestyle/Antisocial Behavior) scores are more reliable and predictive than Factor 1 (Interpersonal/Affective) scores in assessing recidivism risk. Nevertheless, interpersonal-affective offender traits more strongly influence sentencing decisions among mock jurors. We examined PCL-R and Static-99R scores evaluators (N = 99) assigned to three sexual offenders, and the association between these scores and evaluators’ ratings of offender risk (i.e., likelihood of reoffense). Findings suggest that risk ratings were more strongly associated with the personality features assessed by Factor 1 scores than with the antisocial behaviors assessed by Factor 2 scores, even though research reveals the latter are more relevant to risk. Specifically, evaluator perceptions of interpersonal traits (i.e., Facet 1) emerged as the primary determinant of risk judgments, whereas offenders’ antisocial histories (i.e., Facet 4) were not associated with any judgments.
K1 Risk assessment
K1 Psychopathy Checklist–Revised
K1 Static-99R
K1 Forensic assessment instruments
K1 Bias
DO 10.1177/0093854818789974