Arbitration and judicialization
The arbitral world is at a crucial point in its historical development, poised between two conflicting conceptions of its nature, purpose, and political legitimacy. Formally, the arbitrator is an agent of the contracting parties in dispute, a creature of a discrete contract gone wrong. Yet, increasi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2011
|
| In: |
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Year: 2011, Volume: 1, Issue: 9, Pages: 1-23 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1692966650 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230711142446.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200319s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.15496/publikation-39149 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1692966650 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1692966650 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 360 |
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stone Sweet, Alec |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)114656282 |0 (DE-627)517287064 |0 (DE-576)175078769 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Stone Sweet, Alec |a Stone-Sweet, Alec |a Sweet, Alec Stone |a Stone, Alec | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Arbitration and judicialization |c Alec Stone Sweet |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The arbitral world is at a crucial point in its historical development, poised between two conflicting conceptions of its nature, purpose, and political legitimacy. Formally, the arbitrator is an agent of the contracting parties in dispute, a creature of a discrete contract gone wrong. Yet, increasingly, arbitrators are treated as agents of a larger global community, and arbitration houses concern themselves with the general and prospective impact of important awards. In this paper, I address these questions, first, from the standpoint of delegation theory. In Part I, I introduce the basic “Principal-Agent” framework [P-A] used by social scientists to explain why actors create new institutions, and then briefly discuss how P-A has been applied to the study of courts. Part II uses delegation theory to frame discussion of arbitration as a mode of governance for transnational business and investment. In Part III, I argue that the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is presently in the throes of judicialization, indicators of which include the enhanced use of precedent-based argumentation and justification, the acceptance of third-party briefs, and a flirtation with proportionality balancing. Part IV focuses on the first wave of awards rendered by ICSID tribunals pursuant to Argentina’s response to the crushing economic crisis of 2000-02, wherein proportionality emerged, adapted from the jurisprudence of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization. | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4073136-4 |0 (DE-627)106093207 |0 (DE-576)209189509 |a Justiz |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4052717-7 |0 (DE-627)106171208 |0 (DE-576)209099496 |a Schlichtung |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4052348-2 |0 (DE-627)104162392 |0 (DE-576)209098015 |a Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |2 gnd |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law |t Oñati Socio-Legal Series |d Oñati : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011 |g 1(2011), 9, Seite 1-23 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718614828 |w (DE-600)2661059-0 |w (DE-576)365227927 |x 2079-5971 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2011 |g number:9 |g pages:1-23 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-39149 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3610790016 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1692966650 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200319101458 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200319||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21 |c DE-627 |d DE-21 | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Principal-Agent framework | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Arbitration | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Judicialization | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Proportionality | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Balancing | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||