Public perceptions of the seriousness of crime: Weighing the harm and the wrong

The seriousness of crime or ‘crime seriousness' bears on at least four areas of criminal policy (sentencing, criminalization, crime control and prevention) but is poorly defined. After providing a novel conceptualization of crime seriousness, this article explores the logic - or normative philo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Adriaenssen, An (Autor)
Otros Autores: Greenfield, Victoria A. ; Karstedt, Susanne ; Paoli, Letizia ; Pleysier, Stefaan ; Visschers, Jonas
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
En: European journal of criminology
Año: 2020, Volumen: 17, Número: 2, Páginas: 127-150
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Crime control
Crime prevention
Crime seriousness
Criminalization
Criminal policy
Harm
Penal policy
Public opinion
Sentencing
Wrong moralism
Descripción
Sumario:The seriousness of crime or ‘crime seriousness' bears on at least four areas of criminal policy (sentencing, criminalization, crime control and prevention) but is poorly defined. After providing a novel conceptualization of crime seriousness, this article explores the logic - or normative philosophical principles - behind the public's assessment of crime seriousness and considers how the public's logic aligns with legal principles and policy requirements. A general population survey administered in 2014 in Belgium and eliciting 1278 valid responses indicates that the public's logic is more moralist than consequentialist and raises doubts about the validity of public perceptions of crime seriousness as an indicator of crime seriousness for policy-making.
ISSN:1741-2609
DOI:10.1177/1477370818772768