Democratically binding

The aspiration of the 'Democracy Unbound' project was to extend democracy in two dimensions: range and scope. The former would give a wider range of people the vote. The latter would give people a wider scope of things to vote on. In practice, no doubt there is room to do much more of both...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goodin, Robert E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2011
In: Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1689902264
003 DE-627
005 20230711142034.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200212s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.15496/publikation-38294  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1689902264 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1689902264 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
082 0 4 |a 360 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Goodin, Robert E.  |d 1950-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)123928958  |0 (DE-627)085530328  |0 (DE-576)16115770X  |4 aut 
109 |a Goodin, Robert E. 1950-  |a Godin, Robert E. 1950-  |a Goodin, Robert Edward 1950-  |a Goodin, Robert 1950- 
245 1 0 |a Democratically binding  |c Robert E. Goodin 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The aspiration of the 'Democracy Unbound' project was to extend democracy in two dimensions: range and scope. The former would give a wider range of people the vote. The latter would give people a wider scope of things to vote on. In practice, no doubt there is room to do much more of both. But whereas it would be democratically justifiable in an ideal world for democracy to be completely unbounded as regards range, even in an ideal world democracy ought be subject to some limits internal to the logic of democracy itself as regards its scope. 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4011413-2  |0 (DE-627)106352873  |0 (DE-576)208893415  |a Demokratie  |2 gnd 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law  |t Oñati Socio-Legal Series  |d Oñati : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011  |g 1(2011), 5, Seite 1-12  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718614828  |w (DE-600)2661059-0  |w (DE-576)365227927  |x 2079-5971  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2011  |g number:5  |g pages:1-12 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-38294  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2011  |e 5  |h 1-12 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3593896117 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1689902264 
LOK |0 005 20200212150841 
LOK |0 008 200212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21  |c DE-627  |d DE-21 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Bindingness of law 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Democratic franchise 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Limits to democracy 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Democracy 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x Download, Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen, 2020 
LOK |0 935   |a opus  |a krim 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw