How do international lawyers handle facts?: The role of folk sociological theories at the International Criminal Court

The International Criminal Court (ICC) investigates international crimes committed in different parts of the world. Earlier scholarly analysis of the work performed by the ICC judges has pointed out that judges often lack cultural and national understanding of the local norms and customs of regions...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Seroussi, Julien (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
In: The British journal of sociology
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 4500
001 1689889519
003 DE-627
005 20200212133859.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200212s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1468-4446.12604  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1689889519 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1689889519 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Seroussi, Julien  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a How do international lawyers handle facts?  |b The role of folk sociological theories at the International Criminal Court  |c Julien Seroussi 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The International Criminal Court (ICC) investigates international crimes committed in different parts of the world. Earlier scholarly analysis of the work performed by the ICC judges has pointed out that judges often lack cultural and national understanding of the local norms and customs of regions where defendants come from. This article treats this lack of contextual knowledge displayed by the court as a case of structural ignorance rather than an aberration to be ‘exposed’ or censured. International lawyers indeed must ground their legal narratives with plausible sociological explanations of contextual elements to overcome their lack of familiarity with the field and the scarcity of their investigative resources. By uncovering the role of ‘folk sociological theories’ (FSTs) in the establishment of facts in a court context, this article addresses the debate over the efficiency of international criminal justice by highlighting the need to bring historical truth back in. The empirical evidence is based on several years of participant observation in the ICC during the trials against Mathieu Ngudjolo and Germain Katanga, two militiamen from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The British journal of sociology  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1950  |g 69(2018), 4, Seite 962-983  |w (DE-627)302468587  |w (DE-600)1491378-1  |w (DE-576)079719996  |x 1468-4446  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:69  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g pages:962-983 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12604  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 69  |j 2018  |e 4  |h 962-983 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3593851083 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1689889519 
LOK |0 005 20200212133859 
LOK |0 008 200212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a International Criminal Court 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Legal truth 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Folk theory 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw