El uso de la información judicia

Although empirical data on courts and judicial systems are frequently discussed in comparative as well as in economic and sociological studies it turns out that the actors of court reform projects such as judges, law professors, civil servants or politicians don’t make adequate use of them. The pape...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gessner, Volkmar (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2011
In: Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1687941017
003 DE-627
005 20230711141737.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200121s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||spa c
024 7 |a 10.15496/publikation-36607  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1687941017 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1687941017 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a spa 
082 0 4 |a 360 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gessner, Volkmar  |d 1937-2014  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)170469328  |0 (DE-627)060563885  |0 (DE-576)161101135  |4 aut 
109 |a Gessner, Volkmar 1937-2014 
245 1 3 |a El uso de la información judicia  |c Volkmar Gessner 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Although empirical data on courts and judicial systems are frequently discussed in comparative as well as in economic and sociological studies it turns out that the actors of court reform projects such as judges, law professors, civil servants or politicians don’t make adequate use of them. The paper posits that the reasons are of a structural nature which assigns different social roles to those actors. One solution may be the creation of specialized research institutions. A much wider, more pluralistic and more democratic approach is internet transparency which gives access to all kinds of documents including court statistics and empiricial studies to the general public. In order to get an impression of the practice of court transparency a large number of court websites were visited and ranged according to their content. The top positions reached only some anglosaxon and us-american websites which offer legal, economic, organizational as well as empirical information and even offer assistance for using the data. Those efforts may still not reach their purpose if the information isn’t recalled. In order to measure the actual use of the contents of court websites it is insufficient to count the visits. One needs to know more about the concerns leading to those visits. Fortunately, we have found one (Mexican) website which offers information about the visitors: their concerns, their “story” and even their names and (sometimes) place of residence. These petititions have been carefully evaluated and are discussed in the article. It turns out that empirical information about courts and judicial practices is in high demand. Internet transparency seems to be successful although the best forms of offering information still have to be found. 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4073136-4  |0 (DE-627)106093207  |0 (DE-576)209189509  |a Justiz  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4121346-4  |0 (DE-627)105770124  |0 (DE-576)209542543  |a Gericht  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4185917-0  |0 (DE-627)105283649  |0 (DE-576)210035714  |a Transparenz  |2 gnd 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law  |t Oñati Socio-Legal Series  |d Oñati : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011  |g 1(2011), 2, Seite 1-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718614828  |w (DE-600)2661059-0  |w (DE-576)365227927  |x 2079-5971  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:1-26 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-36607  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2011  |e 2  |h 1-26 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3577792930 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1687941017 
LOK |0 005 20200121104732 
LOK |0 008 200121||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21  |c DE-627  |d DE-21 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Court reform 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Judicial statistics 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Empirical research on courts 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Internet transparency 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Court websites 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Access to judicial information 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Users of public information on courts 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Use of social science information 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Rationalization of political processes 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Democratization of court reform 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x Download, Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen, 2019 
LOK |0 935   |a opus  |a krim 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw