Leniency in exchange for cartel confessions

Leniency offers corporations the possibility to come clean about their involvement in cartel conduct (for example, price-fixing, bid-rigging) in exchange for immunity or reduction of financial penalties. In Europe, nearly 60 percent of detected cartels are discovered through leniency. This makes len...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jaspers, J.D. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
En: European journal of criminology
Año: 2020, Volumen: 17, Número: 1, Páginas: 106-124
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 168759211X
003 DE-627
005 20200224165348.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200116s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1477370819874432  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)168759211X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP168759211X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Jaspers, J.D.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1205295623  |0 (DE-627)1690884118  |4 aut 
109 |a Jaspers, J.D.  |a Jaspers, Jelle D. 
245 1 0 |a Leniency in exchange for cartel confessions  |c J.D. Jaspers 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Leniency offers corporations the possibility to come clean about their involvement in cartel conduct (for example, price-fixing, bid-rigging) in exchange for immunity or reduction of financial penalties. In Europe, nearly 60 percent of detected cartels are discovered through leniency. This makes leniency the most applied detection tool for uncovering cartel conduct violations. What are the considerations in applying for leniency or refraining from doing so? How do those considerations relate to private law enforcement through civil liability regarding business cartels? These questions are discussed based on semi-structured interviews (n = 34) with cartelists, competition lawyers and in-house legal counsel to study theoretical assumptions underpinning leniency arrangements in the Netherlands. This study investigates four scenarios on the use of leniency suggested in the literature and finds empirical support for only two. Strategic use of leniency and false confessions occur in the Netherlands, but to a lesser extent than the existing literature suggests. Moreover, various disincentives, and especially the rise of private enforcement, make leniency an unattractive and uncertain option for cartelists. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal of criminology  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2004  |g 17(2020), 1, Seite 106-124  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)379048256  |w (DE-600)2135314-1  |w (DE-576)112775543  |x 1741-2609  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:106-124 
856 |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477370819874432  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477370819874432  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 17  |j 2020  |e 1  |h 106-124 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 357601876X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 168759211X 
LOK |0 005 20200116171919 
LOK |0 008 200116||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Business cartels 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Corporate crime 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Regulatory enforcement 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Whistle-blowing 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw