RT Book
T1 The appeal of internal review: law, administrative justice and the (non-) emergence of disputes
T2 Bloomsbury collections
A1 Cowan, David
A2 Halliday, Simon 1966-
LA English
PP Oxford
PB Hart Publishing
YR 2003
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1687003556
AB 1 INTRODUCTION -- 2 HOMELESSNESS LAW AND INTERNAL REVIEW IN CONTEXT -- 3 SOUTHFIELD COUNCIL -- 4 BRISFORD COUNCIL -- 5 UNDERSTANDING THE FAILURE TO PURSUE INTERNAL REVIEW -- 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PURSUIT OF INTERNAL REVIEW -- 7 LAWYERS AND OTHER COPING STRATEGIES -- 8 CONCLUSION
AB Why do most welfare applicants fail to challenge adverse decisions despite a continuing sense of need? The book addresses this severely under-researched and under-theorised question. Using English homelessness law as their case study,the authors explore why homeless applicants did -- but more often did not -- challenge adverse decisions by seeking internal administrative review. They draw out from their data a list of the barriers to the take up of grievance rights. Further, by combining extensive interview data from aggrieved homeless applicants with ethnographic data about bureaucratic decision-making, they are able to situate these barriers within the dynamics of the citizen-bureaucracy relationship. Additionally, they point to other contexts which inform applicants' decisions about whether to request an internal review. Drawing on a diverse literature -- risk, trust, audit, legal consciousness, and complaints -- the authors lay the foundations for our understanding of the (non-)emergence of administrative disputes
CN KD3299
SN 9781472559487
K1 Public welfare administration : Law and legislation : England
K1 Administrative remedies : England
K1 Homeless Persons : England
K1 Bibliografie
K1 Großbritannien : Fürsorge
DO 10.5040/9781472559487