|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000naa a22000002 4500 |
001 |
168587083X |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20191218092618.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
191218s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.01.001
|2 doi
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)168587083X
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP168587083X
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Shahbazov, Inqilab
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Excessive use of pre-trial detention in Azerbaijan
|b Examination of the causes
|c Inqilab Shahbazov, Elsever Muradov
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2019
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a As a country with a criminal justice system that has historically put too much emphasis on the use of custodial preventive measures, Azerbaijan has suffered from the consequences of the overuse of pre-trial detention. The management of detention centres has become a financial and logistical burden for the government, and the excessive use of pre-trial detention as a preventive measure for accused persons has also had deleterious effects on detainees and communities. Through the analysis of the secondary data, this article attempts to understand the causes of the overuse of pre-trial custody in the context where a variety of alternative options is available. The paper argues that a deviation from the guidelines on the part of the judiciary, procurators and investigators, corrupt practices in the pre-trial phase and sufficient degree of judicial independence have been the key reasons behind the over-reliance on pre-trial detention.
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Muradov, Elsever
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t International journal of law, crime and justice
|d Oxford : Elsevier, 2008
|g 57(2019), Seite 1-12
|h Online-Ressource
|w (DE-627)559427743
|w (DE-600)2412511-8
|w (DE-576)278242537
|x 1756-0616
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:57
|g year:2019
|g pages:1-12
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.01.001
|x Resolving-System
|
936 |
u |
w |
|d 57
|j 2019
|h 1-12
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 3566385786
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 168587083X
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20191218092618
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 191218||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-21-110
|c DE-627
|d DE-21-110
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Criminal justice system
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a g
|a Azerbaijan
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Pre-trial detention
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Overuse
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Alternative options
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-21-110
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a krub
|a krzo
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|