Negotiating release?: Analysing decision making in bail court
The vast majority of accused in Canada are released on bail with conditions pending the resolution of their case. As members of the court-room workgroup, the defence, the Crown, and the Justice of the Peace (JP) are tasked with negotiating a set of release conditions in a timely fashion; yet little...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
In: |
Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice
Year: 2019, Volume: 61, Issue: 3, Pages: 45-66 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
Summary: | The vast majority of accused in Canada are released on bail with conditions pending the resolution of their case. As members of the court-room workgroup, the defence, the Crown, and the Justice of the Peace (JP) are tasked with negotiating a set of release conditions in a timely fashion; yet little work has attempted to understand how exchanges between these court-room participants shape the number and type of bail conditions imposed and how closely their in-court actions align with their legally mandated roles. Data collected from court-room observations of 257 bail cases in southwestern Ontario show that the distinct occupational roles of the defence, the Crown, and JPs are blurred within bail proceedings, contributing to a culture of numerous conditions and restrictive releases |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1911-0219 |
DOI: | 10.3138/cjccj.2018-0028 |