Equal or not?: private versus public corrections services, programming, and climate

More rigorous comparisons of private and public corrections are needed to improve our understanding of the effects of privatization. We develop a three‐step procedure for assessing equivalence and then performance measures. To illustrate these arguments, we provide an empirical descriptive analysis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woolredge, John (Author)
Contributors: Cochran, Joshua C.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
In: Criminology & public policy
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 166753629X
003 DE-627
005 20190723115221.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190617s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1745-9133.12429  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)166753629X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP166753629X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Woolredge, John  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1172316767  |0 (DE-627)1041123523  |0 (DE-576)513928022  |4 aut 
109 |a Woolredge, John 
245 1 0 |a Equal or not?  |b private versus public corrections services, programming, and climate  |c John Wooldredge, Joshua C. Cochran 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a More rigorous comparisons of private and public corrections are needed to improve our understanding of the effects of privatization. We develop a three‐step procedure for assessing equivalence and then performance measures. To illustrate these arguments, we provide an empirical descriptive analysis of two private prisons and five structurally equivalent state‐run prisons in Ohio and document heterogeneity in resources, staff climate, and inmate behaviors. 
700 1 |a Cochran, Joshua C.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1068304650  |0 (DE-627)820045888  |0 (DE-576)37773344X  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminology & public policy  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 2001  |g 18(2019), 2, Seite 295-321  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)357169069  |w (DE-600)2094251-5  |w (DE-576)262493047  |x 1745-9133  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:295-321 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12429  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 18  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 295-321 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3487918323 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 166753629X 
LOK |0 005 20190617142425 
LOK |0 008 190617||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Corrections 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Prisons 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Privatization 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Programming 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Gefängnisse 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Privatgefängnisse 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Strafvollzug 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw