When victims refuse and prosecutors decline: examining exceptional clearance in sexual assault cases

This study examines the predictors of sexual assault case clearance, with a focus on arrest and two types of exceptional clearance: victim refusal to cooperate and prosecutorial declination to prosecute. Using National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data on crime incidents that contain a se...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Richards, Tara N. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Skubak Tillyer, Marie ; Wright, Emily M.
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En: Crime & delinquency
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Verlag)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
NIBRS
Predictors of arrest
Prosecutorial discretion
Prädiktoren
Secondary victimization
Sexual assault
Sexueller Übergriff
Staatsanwaltliches Ermessen
Descripción
Sumario:This study examines the predictors of sexual assault case clearance, with a focus on arrest and two types of exceptional clearance: victim refusal to cooperate and prosecutorial declination to prosecute. Using National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data on crime incidents that contain a sexual offense (N = 21,977), we estimated a multinomial regression model to examine the predictors of different clearance types for cases of sexual assault. Results indicated that the likelihood of victim refusal decreases in cases perpetrated by strangers, involving victim injury, occurring in public, and involving multiple offenses. A similar pattern of findings was observed for the decision to decline to prosecute a case. In addition, prosecutors are more likely to decline to prosecute cases with male victims and older victims. We discuss the implications of our findings and directions for future research.
ISSN:1552-387X
DOI:10.1177/0011128719828351