Government and control

Advanced liberal democracies are currently witnessing a bewildering variety of developments in regimes of control. These range from demands for execution or preventive detention of implacably dangerous or risky individuals - sexual predators, paedophiles, persistent violent offenders - to the develo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rose, Nikolas (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2000
En: The British journal of criminology
Año: 2000, Volumen: 40, Número: 2, Páginas: 321-339
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1640124322
003 DE-627
005 20220608131201.0
007 tu
008 160223s2000 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1640124322 
035 |a (DE-576)456057234 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456057234 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rose, Nikolas  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Government and control  |c Nikolas Rose 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Advanced liberal democracies are currently witnessing a bewildering variety of developments in regimes of control. These range from demands for execution or preventive detention of implacably dangerous or risky individuals - sexual predators, paedophiles, persistent violent offenders - to the development of dispersed, designed in-control regimes for the continual, silent and largely invisible work of the assessment, management, communication and control of risk. Political programmes of crime control appear to have little stability, cycling rapidly through all the alternatives from prison works', short, sharp shocks' and boot camps', through community corrections' and reintegrative shaming' via therapeutic rehabilitation' to nothing works' and three strikes and you're out'. Of course, programmes of crime control have always had less to do with control of crime than they have to do with more general concerns with the government of the moral order. And concerns about illegality and crime have been articulated as much, if not more, by institutions and practices which are not part of the criminal justice system than by those that are conventionally considered to be part of such a system'. Nonetheless, even at this more general level, things seem confusing. Despite claims that we live in a post-disciplinary society (Simon), that dangerousness has given way to risk (Castel), that control in now continuous, immanent and cybernetic rather than discontinuous, localized and individualizing (Deleuze), there appears to be little strategic coherence about these developments at the level of their rationalities, and much diversity and contingency at the level of their technologies. This paper will attempt to explore this complexity along a number of dimensions. It will consider the ways in which particular regimes of illegalities' have been individuated and problematized, and suggest that, although these are diverse, some at least can be understood as infractions of freedom, that is to say, as problematic because they throw into question the very presuppositions of moral consciousness, self-control and self-advancement through legitimate consumption upon which governmental regimes of freedom depend. It will consider the conceptions of the criminal' that circulate within practices for the government of illegality, and suggest that, despite the apparent diversity of these conceptions - where biological arguments about inherited tendencies cohabit with communitarian arguments about the virtues - the pervasive image of the perpetrator of crime is not one of the juridical subject of the rule of law, nor that of the bio-psychological subject of positivist criminology, but of the responsible subject of moral community guided - or misguided - by ethical self-steering mechanisms. And it will consider the forms of knowledge and modes of expertise that are implicated in these new techniques and rationalities of control 
773 0 8 |i In  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Univ. Press, 1960  |g 40(2000), 2, Seite 321-339  |w (DE-627)129851361  |w (DE-600)280389-6  |w (DE-576)015150712  |x 0007-0955  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:2000  |g number:2  |g pages:321-339 
776 1 |o 10.1093/bjc/40.2.321 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3301468098 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1640124322 
LOK |0 005 20250516151311 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Sozialkontrolle 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Kriminalitätsbekämpfung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Programme 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Moral 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Verstoß 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Kriminalitätsbekämpfung 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw