Contemporary penal trends. Modern or postmodern?
The postmodern argument in the punishment literature is in its formative beginnings. The achievements in applying a postmodern framework to the study of punishment, thus far, have been speculative and empirically narrow. Consequently, a question that remains is do postmodern or modern conceptions ca...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
1998
|
| In: |
The British journal of criminology
Year: 1998, Volume: 38, Issue: 1, Pages: 106-123 |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Availability in Tübingen: | Present in Tübingen. IFK: In: Z 7 |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1640121269 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220608131159.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160223s1998 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1640121269 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)456056629 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ456056629 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lucken, Karol |0 (DE-588)1127648314 |0 (DE-627)882148664 |0 (DE-576)174284748 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Lucken, Karol |a Lucken, Karol M. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contemporary penal trends. Modern or postmodern? |c Karol Lucken |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1998 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The postmodern argument in the punishment literature is in its formative beginnings. The achievements in applying a postmodern framework to the study of punishment, thus far, have been speculative and empirically narrow. Consequently, a question that remains is do postmodern or modern conceptions capture the form and function of contemporary penality'? The current study addrerses this question by exploring contemporary penality as it exists for those working in the penal system. Three salient trends are identified penality as a balancing act, corporate penality, and offender subsidization of penality. A modern and pastmodern interpretation are considered in the analysis of these trends. it is concluded that contemporary penality is not qualitatively different from past penality, and therefore, is best understood in the context of modernity | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t The British journal of criminology |d Oxford : Univ. Press, 1960 |g 38(1998), 1, Seite 106-123 |w (DE-627)129851361 |w (DE-600)280389-6 |w (DE-576)015150712 |x 0007-0955 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:1998 |g number:1 |g pages:106-123 |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 38 |j 1998 |e 1 |h 106-123 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3301462022 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1640121269 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20160223101154 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Kriminalitätskontrolle | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Kriminalpolitik | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Pönologie | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Konzepte | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Strafrechtsentwicklung | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Postmoderne | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Grundtendenzen | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Entwicklung | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |c In: Z 7 |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a k110 | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
| SIG | |a IFK: In: Z 7 | ||