Handle with care. On the use of structuration theory within criminology

This paper critically examines how Anthony Giddens's theory of structuration has been utilized within criminological studies. It suggests that rather than resolving many traditional dilemmas within sociology, structuration theory effaces them by compacting together structure and agency. Adverti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vaughan, Barry (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2001
In: The British journal of criminology
Year: 2001, Volume: 41, Issue: 1, Pages: 185-200
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Availability in Tübingen:Present in Tübingen.
IFK: In: Z 7
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1640119809
003 DE-627
005 20220608131157.0
007 tu
008 160223s2001 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/bjc/41.1.185  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1640119809 
035 |a (DE-576)456056327 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456056327 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Vaughan, Barry  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Handle with care. On the use of structuration theory within criminology  |c Barry Vaughan 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper critically examines how Anthony Giddens's theory of structuration has been utilized within criminological studies. It suggests that rather than resolving many traditional dilemmas within sociology, structuration theory effaces them by compacting together structure and agency. Adverting to the critical literature on structuration theory, it points out the consequences of binding structure and agency together so tightly. The distinctive properties of each are collapsed into social practices which entail that structure is defined virtually - in terms of rules and resources - so that it does not have an objective existence. This confers a spurious malleability upon social structures, yet structuration theory is unable to specify when transformation will occur, and also fails to explain why there should be change since agents are overwhelmingly concerned with the preservation of security through the adherence to routines. These and other deleterious consequences are drawn out through an examination of three studies that incorporate structuration theory and they are traced to an unwillingness to conceive of social reality as being multidimensional, with each level possessing its own distinctive properties 
773 0 8 |i In  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Univ. Press, 1960  |g 41(2001), 1, Seite 185-200  |w (DE-627)129851361  |w (DE-600)280389-6  |w (DE-576)015150712  |x 0007-0955  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:41  |g year:2001  |g number:1  |g pages:185-200 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.1.185  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3301459331 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1640119809 
LOK |0 005 20160223101153 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Strukturalistische Kriminologie 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Strukturalismus 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Kriminologie 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |c In: Z 7  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw 
SIG |a IFK: In: Z 7