Discretionary leniency and typological guilt: results from a Danish study of police discretion

Results from a qualitative study of police discretion in Denmark are presented. The aim of the study was to investigate the background for police decisions made on the spot, and to determine whether or not police discretion amounts to discrimination. Police discretion is analysed as two distinct for...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holmberg, Lars (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2000
In: Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Availability in Tübingen:Present in Tübingen.
IFK: In: Z 181
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1640104178
003 DE-627
005 20220608131128.0
007 tu
008 160223s2000 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/140438500300076171  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1640104178 
035 |a (DE-576)456053034 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456053034 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Holmberg, Lars  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Discretionary leniency and typological guilt: results from a Danish study of police discretion  |c Lars Holmberg 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Results from a qualitative study of police discretion in Denmark are presented. The aim of the study was to investigate the background for police decisions made on the spot, and to determine whether or not police discretion amounts to discrimination. Police discretion is analysed as two distinct forms of power, namely the power of definition/suspicion and the power of procedure/prosecution. The study shows that both forms are used in a discriminatory way, and it is argued that use of the power of suspicion results in discrimination. The power of prosecution, on the other hand, need not necessarily entail discrimination, but in practice it often does. The police discern between ?typical offenders' and ?decent citizens' and treat suspects differently according to type. The reason for this discrimination, it is argued, can be found in officers' notions of typological guilt , a form of ? alleged figuilt that is independent of concrete evidence. Differences in the degree of leniency experienced by different types of suspect can be interpreted as vicarious punishment of the typologically guilty. The impact of this kind of police practice on police?citizen relations, and possibilities for improvement, are discussed 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention  |d Basingstoke : Taylor & Francis, 2000  |g 1(2000), 2, Seite 179-194  |w (DE-627)320606589  |w (DE-600)2020826-1  |w (DE-576)091139155  |x 1404-3858  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2000  |g number:2  |g pages:179-194 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/140438500300076171  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2000  |e 2  |h 179-194 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 330142709X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1640104178 
LOK |0 005 20160223101137 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Polizeiliches Handeln 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Diskriminierung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Macht 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |c In: Z 181  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw 
SIG |a IFK: In: Z 181