Towards a Theory of Institutionalized Judicial Exceptionalism

What happens when the exception becomes the norm, what happens when the law becomes a form for that which cannot have a legal form, that is, the political? The focus of this article is a form of power politics that is institutionalised and set up to work side by side with the existing legal system a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rosén, Frederik (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2005
In: Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention
Year: 2005, Volume: 6, Issue: 2, Pages: 147-164
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1640103678
003 DE-627
005 20220608131128.0
007 tu
008 160223s2005 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1640103678 
035 |a (DE-576)456052925 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456052925 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rosén, Frederik  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Towards a Theory of Institutionalized Judicial Exceptionalism  |c Frederik Rosén 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a What happens when the exception becomes the norm, what happens when the law becomes a form for that which cannot have a legal form, that is, the political? The focus of this article is a form of power politics that is institutionalised and set up to work side by side with the existing legal system as a sort of normalized, co-ordinated court procedure, initiated with the aim of subjecting specific groups (terrorists, criminals) to extended regulatory control and enforcement. These strategic bureaucratic mechanisms of exclusion appear as security enforced measures, which side by side with the existing 'normal' legal system govern a specific judicial-political area. The normalised (or rooted, if one wishes) incorporation of extra-judicial authority within the legal system will in the article be refered to as institutionalised judicial exceptionalism. The purpose of the article is to theorise and conceptualise the in many ways murky or indistinct phenomenon of institutionalised judicial exceptionalism.This task includes suggesting a model capable of assimilating within its theory the displacement in the relationship between the state, the law and the citizen that stems from the fact that the ever more securitized discourses on terrorism and crime increasingly take priority over the ordinarily non-derogable principle of equality before the law 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention  |d Basingstoke : Taylor & Francis, 2000  |g 6(2005), 2, Seite 147-164  |w (DE-627)320606589  |w (DE-600)2020826-1  |w (DE-576)091139155  |x 1404-3858  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2005  |g number:2  |g pages:147-164 
776 1 |o 10.1080/14043850500399249 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3301426034 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1640103678 
LOK |0 005 20250407140408 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Terrorismus 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Terrorismusstrafrecht 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Terrorismusgesetzgebung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Rechtstheorie 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Notstand 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Feindstrafrecht 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw