|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000caa a22000002 4500 |
| 001 |
1639878130 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20220608130408.0 |
| 007 |
tu |
| 008 |
160223s1997 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1639878130
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-576)455996776
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)BSZ455996776
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Henseler, T. B.
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
2 |
|a A critical look at the admissibility of polygraph evidence in the wake of Daubert: The lie detector fails the test
|c T.B Henseler
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 1997
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i In
|a Catholic University Law Review
|g 46(1997), 4, Seite 1247-1297
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:46
|g year:1997
|g number:4
|g pages:1247-1297
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 936 |
u |
w |
|d 46
|j 1997
|e 4
|h 1247-1297
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| ELC |
|
|
|b 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 3300967864
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1639878130
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20160223100655
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-21-110
|c DE-627
|d DE-21-110
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Lügendetektor
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|z Kein Bestand am IfK; Nachweis für KrimDok
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-21-110
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|m v
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a k110
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 938
|k v
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
