Truth Commission Amnesties and the International Criminal Court

Truth commissions and the new International Criminal Court (ICC) appear to be very different mechanisms for dealing with human rights abuses: the primary purpose of a truth commission is to compile an accurate record of what happened, whereas the ICC is designed to punish individual perpetrators. Th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roche, Declan (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:Undetermined language
Published: 2005
In: The British journal of criminology
Year: 2005, Volume: 45, Issue: 4, Pages: 565-581
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1639655077
003 DE-627
005 20220608125706.0
007 tu
008 160223s2005 xx ||||| 00| ||und c
035 |a (DE-627)1639655077 
035 |a (DE-576)455935327 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ455935327 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
100 1 |a Roche, Declan  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Truth Commission Amnesties and the International Criminal Court  |c Declan Roche 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Truth commissions and the new International Criminal Court (ICC) appear to be very different mechanisms for dealing with human rights abuses: the primary purpose of a truth commission is to compile an accurate record of what happened, whereas the ICC is designed to punish individual perpetrators. This article considers how these two institutions will interact, and, more specifically, how the ICC Prosecutor will deal with perpetrators who have been granted amnesties by a truth commission in return for divulging their crimes. The ICC Statute, which contains the powers of the Court and the Prosecutor, fails to provide the ICC Prosecutor with any clear guidance on this question. On one interpretation it supports a prosecutorial policy that completely ignores amnesties, but on another, it supports the Prosecutor who decides to work cooperatively with those truth commissions that are able to demonstrate their legitimacy. Under a cooperative approach the Prosecutor would delay bringing any prosecutions until a truth commission has completed its work and then prosecute individuals from the pool who had not been granted amnesties. Such an approach could bolster the legitimacy of the ICC, by providing a principled basis for the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, and assist truth commissions, by encouraging more perpetrators of serious crimes to apply for amnesties, and, in the process, divulge their secrets 
773 0 8 |i In  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Univ. Press, 1960  |g 45(2005), 4, Seite 565-581  |w (DE-627)129851361  |w (DE-600)280389-6  |w (DE-576)015150712  |x 0007-0955  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2005  |g number:4  |g pages:565-581 
776 1 |o 10.1093/bjc/azi038 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3300500249 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1639655077 
LOK |0 005 20250516142545 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Internationaler Strafgerichtshof 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Menschenrechtsverletzung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Wahrheitskommission 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Zusammenarbeit 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Amnestie 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Legalität 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw