Risks, Ethics, and Airport Security

A key distinction needs to be made between formal and informal risk profiling. It is usually assumed that formal risk profiling, based on statistical data, provides an optimal means of prediction and thus of detecting high-risk individuals or situations. However, it must be recognized that formal pr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O'Malley, Pat (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2006
In: Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1639319557
003 DE-627
005 20220608124720.0
007 tu
008 160223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1639319557 
035 |a (DE-576)455835063 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ455835063 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a O'Malley, Pat  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Risks, Ethics, and Airport Security  |c Pat O'Malley 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A key distinction needs to be made between formal and informal risk profiling. It is usually assumed that formal risk profiling, based on statistical data, provides an optimal means of prediction and thus of detecting high-risk individuals or situations. However, it must be recognized that formal profiles are based extensively on informal profiles - those built upon the experience and working cultures of security-related officials. Formal profiles are thus prone to the same errors and tend to produce self-fulfilling prophecies, resulting in both errors of fact and discriminatory consequences for false-positive cases. All profiles, however, are fraught with problems, perhaps the most obvious and significant being that the targets of interdiction readily become aware of them and modify their operations to incorporate activities and/or individuals that do not fit existing profiles. Consequently, totally risk-based security, ironically, may become less effective than alternatives such as randomly assigned focused interdictions. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice  |d Ottawa, Ont. : Assoc., 2003  |g 48(2006), 3, Seite 413-421  |w (DE-627)364113855  |w (DE-600)2110799-3  |w (DE-576)105431184  |x 1707-7753  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2006  |g number:3  |g pages:413-421 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 48  |j 2006  |e 3  |h 413-421 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3299794647 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1639319557 
LOK |0 005 20160223095210 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Risikoeinschätzung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Sicherheitsmaßnahmen 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Ethik 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Luftsicherheitskontrolle 
LOK |0 852   |z Kein Bestand am IfK; Nachweis für KrimDok 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |m v  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k v 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw