Reflections on Risk Analysis, Screening, and Contested Rationalities

The concept of risk and modelling it (imagining possible outcomes with negative consequences) has a long history in social science and crisis management. Risk lies in the shadow between the known and the unknown. This article reflects discussions of low-probability, high-cost events such as those re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manning, Peter K. (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2006
In: Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 163931945X
003 DE-627
005 20220608124720.0
007 tu
008 160223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)163931945X 
035 |a (DE-576)455835047 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ455835047 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Manning, Peter K.  |4 aut 
109 |a Manning, Peter K. 
245 1 0 |a Reflections on Risk Analysis, Screening, and Contested Rationalities  |c Peter K. Manning 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The concept of risk and modelling it (imagining possible outcomes with negative consequences) has a long history in social science and crisis management. Risk lies in the shadow between the known and the unknown. This article reflects discussions of low-probability, high-cost events such as those reflected in the conventional tactics associated with terrorism. Risks and fear of them are shaped extraordinarily by 'big bang events' such as 9/11, and these shape imagined future deciding, prevention tactics, and organizational routines. Short-time crisis deciding is guided inordinately by 'group effects,' pressure for consensus, and action over cogitation, difference, and muddling through. The attraction of risk analysis to security matters is clear: It makes simple decisions that are not. It easily fits with the technological conceit that assumes electronic-computer-based surveillance, artifice, and models can reduce human judgement to questions easily answered by a computer with a database. It enables a front stage of statistical rational planning and execution of policies that fail but permit backstage manipulations, profit taking, and obfuscation of matters of human judgement. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice  |d Ottawa, Ont. : Assoc., 2003  |g 48(2006), 3, Seite 453-469  |w (DE-627)364113855  |w (DE-600)2110799-3  |w (DE-576)105431184  |x 1707-7753  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2006  |g number:3  |g pages:453-469 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 48  |j 2006  |e 3  |h 453-469 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3299794469 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 163931945X 
LOK |0 005 20160223095210 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Terrorismus 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Risikoeinschätzung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Prävention 
LOK |0 852   |z Kein Bestand am IfK; Nachweis für KrimDok 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |m v  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k v 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw