Denying Responsibility: Sentencers' Accounts of their Decisions to Imprison

The reasons for dramatic rises in prison populations are the focus of much debate. This paper examines just one of these: the sentencing practices of the judiciary who play a pivotal role both in determining the use of imprisonment itself and in the severity of prison sentences. Drawing on research...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tombs, Jacqueline (Author)
Contributors: Jagger, Elizabeth
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2006
In: The British journal of criminology
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Availability in Tübingen:Present in Tübingen.
IFK: In: Z 7
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1639317864
003 DE-627
005 20220608124719.0
007 tu
008 160223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/bjc/azl002  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1639317864 
035 |a (DE-576)455834717 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ455834717 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Tombs, Jacqueline  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Denying Responsibility: Sentencers' Accounts of their Decisions to Imprison  |c Jacqueline Tombs, Elizabeth Jagger 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The reasons for dramatic rises in prison populations are the focus of much debate. This paper examines just one of these: the sentencing practices of the judiciary who play a pivotal role both in determining the use of imprisonment itself and in the severity of prison sentences. Drawing on research with Scottish sentencers, it explores how they made decisions to imprison, how they viewed prison, how they justified sending people there and how borderline' offenders were dealt with. We found that although sentencers viewed imprisonment as a severe punishment, they normalized their routine incarceration of individuals by, in effect, denying final responsibility for their actions. Sentencers' accounts of borderline decisions, in which individuals committing the same offence could be accorded either a custodial or a community disposal, illustrated these denials most starkly and revealed an overarching retributivism in their custodial decisions. This retributivism was without proportionality in so far as it was directed at the offender rather than proportionate to the offence. In conclusion, we argue for future sentencing policies and legislation to take heed of sentencers' logic in use 
700 1 |a Jagger, Elizabeth  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i In  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Univ. Press, 1960  |g 46(2006), 5, Seite 803-821  |w (DE-627)129851361  |w (DE-600)280389-6  |w (DE-576)015150712  |x 0007-0955  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:46  |g year:2006  |g number:5  |g pages:803-821 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl002  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 46  |j 2006  |e 5  |h 803-821 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3299791451 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1639317864 
LOK |0 005 20160223095208 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Strafzumessungspraxis 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Freiheitsstrafe 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Urteilsfindung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Richter 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Einstellungen 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Strafeinstellungen 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Vergeltung 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |c In: Z 7  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw 
SIG |a IFK: In: Z 7