European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights
"Has the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court) lost its legitimacy? The answer to this question is perhaps 'no'. If this was the case, the Contracting Parties would stop executing judgments of the Court; the applicants would stop bringing their complaints to the Court; and,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2015
|
| In: | Year: 2015 |
| Edition: | 1. publ. |
| Online Access: |
Cover (Publisher) Table of Contents (Publisher) |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Subito Delivery Service: | Order now. |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1613570740 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250821101156.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 150219s2015 xxk||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a GBB512932 |2 UK | |
| 016 | 7 | |a 017036904 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 9781107041035 |c hbk. : £65.00 |9 978-1-107-04103-5 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9781107041035 | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1613570740 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)426532953 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ426532953 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)914367036 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)904462878 | ||
| 035 | |a (BL)017036904 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJC5138 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.48094 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.2408/50269 |q LOC |2 23 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a LAW051000 |q bisacsh |
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a PS 4140 |q OBV |2 rvk |0 (DE-625)rvk/139835: | ||
| 084 | |a MK 5040 |2 rvk |0 (DE-625)rvk/123065: | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin |0 (DE-588)1050015118 |0 (DE-627)783139306 |0 (DE-576)34712397X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights |c Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou |
| 250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a XXIV, 229 S. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. The concept of European consensus; 3. Types of consensus; 4. Behind the scenes: comparative analysis within the Court; 5. Criticism of European consensus; 6. Legitimacy of the Court and legitimacy of its judgments; 7. European consensus: perceptions of the ECtHR judges; 8. Conclusion. | |
| 520 | |a "Has the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court) lost its legitimacy? The answer to this question is perhaps 'no'. If this was the case, the Contracting Parties would stop executing judgments of the Court; the applicants would stop bringing their complaints to the Court; and, finally, the Contracting Parties would denounce the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR or Convention). Another option might be that the ECtHR would continue to exist without having any real impact on human rights standards in Europe and its judgments would lose much of their value. This has not yet happened. International tribunals, including the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), face a substantial structural deficiency; they operate within systems that lack the coercive capacity to enforce their judgments. International courts thus depend, to a greater degree than domestic courts, on the legitimacy of their judgments as a basis upon which to encourage, and in effect coerce, compliance"-- | ||
| 520 | |a "In order to be effective, international tribunals should be perceived as legitimate adjudicators. European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights provides in-depth analyses on whether European consensus is capable of enhancing the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Focusing on the method and value of European consensus, it examines the practicalities of consensus identification and application and discusses whether State-counting is appropriate in human rights adjudication. With over 30 interviews from judges of the ECtHR and qualitative analyses of the case law, this book gives readers access to firsthand and up-to-date information and provides an understanding of how the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg interprets the European Convention on Human Rights"-- | ||
| 520 | |a "Has the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court) lost its legitimacy? The answer to this question is perhaps 'no'. If this was the case, the Contracting Parties would stop executing judgments of the Court; the applicants would stop bringing their complaints to the Court; and, finally, the Contracting Parties would denounce the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR or Convention). Another option might be that the ECtHR would continue to exist without having any real impact on human rights standards in Europe and its judgments would lose much of their value. This has not yet happened. International tribunals, including the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), face a substantial structural deficiency; they operate within systems that lack the coercive capacity to enforce their judgments. International courts thus depend, to a greater degree than domestic courts, on the legitimacy of their judgments as a basis upon which to encourage, and in effect coerce, compliance"-- | ||
| 520 | |a "In order to be effective, international tribunals should be perceived as legitimate adjudicators. European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights provides in-depth analyses on whether European consensus is capable of enhancing the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Focusing on the method and value of European consensus, it examines the practicalities of consensus identification and application and discusses whether State-counting is appropriate in human rights adjudication. With over 30 interviews from judges of the ECtHR and qualitative analyses of the case law, this book gives readers access to firsthand and up-to-date information and provides an understanding of how the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg interprets the European Convention on Human Rights"-- | ||
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a European Court of Human Rights |
| 650 | 0 | |a International human rights courts |z Europe | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d b |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |0 (DE-627)103022066 |0 (DE-576)191153036 |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |2 gnd |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |0 (DE-627)106249657 |0 (DE-576)209010436 |a Legitimität |2 gnd |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |0 (DE-627)106357514 |0 (DE-576)208888438 |a Konsens |2 gnd |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-101 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |d b |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |0 (DE-627)103022066 |0 (DE-576)191153036 |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |2 gnd |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |0 (DE-627)106357514 |0 (DE-576)208888438 |a Konsens |2 gnd |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4114382-6 |0 (DE-627)105822604 |0 (DE-576)209484152 |a Legitimation |2 gnd |
| 689 | 1 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Rezensiert in |a Ropp, Steve C., 1941 - |t Legitimacy in global politics |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1933694319 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz426532953inh.htm |m B:DE-576;DE-Frei85 |q application/pdf |v 20151106120037 |x Verlag |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/41035/cover/9781107041035.jpg |v 2015-03-31 |x Verlag |3 Cover |
| 889 | |w (DE-627)819027049 | ||
| 935 | |i mdedup | ||
| 936 | r | v | |a PS 4140 |b Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |k Rechtswissenschaft |k Europarecht; Recht der Europäischen Gemeinschaften bzw. der Europäischen Union und der sonstigen europäischen Organisationen; Europäische Rechtsvereinheitlichung |k Europarat |k Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (BF Menschenrechtskonvention <1950>) |k Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-627)1271436531 |0 (DE-625)rvk/139835: |0 (DE-576)201436531 |
| 936 | r | v | |a MK 5040 |b Juristische Zusammenhänge, Menschenrechte, Staatsbürgerschaft |k Politologie |k Internationale Politik |k Internationale Integration, Internationale Organisationen |k Europäische Integration |k Juristische Zusammenhänge, Menschenrechte, Staatsbürgerschaft |0 (DE-627)1390809773 |0 (DE-625)rvk/123065: |0 (DE-576)320809773 |
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 317652207X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1613570740 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20151102075021 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 150923||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Frei85 |c DE-627 |d DE-Frei85 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Frei85 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
| TIM | |a 100019590101_100020251231 |b 1959 - 2025 | ||
