The thirteenth juror
Judges presiding over jury trials are tasked with imposing sentence on convicted defendants, even though they play little role in deciding guilt. When judges agree with the jury’s verdict, this arrangement is unproblematic; when they do not, judges are placed in a challenging predicament. Although t...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2019
|
| In: |
The British journal of criminology
Year: 2019, Volume: 59, Issue: 2, Pages: 315-333 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1590172299 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190314164159.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190312s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/bjc/azy029 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1590172299 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)520172299 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ520172299 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nir, Esther |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1180785509 |0 (DE-627)1067865853 |0 (DE-576)520317149 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Nir, Esther | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The thirteenth juror |c Esther Nir, Elizabeth Griffiths |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Judges presiding over jury trials are tasked with imposing sentence on convicted defendants, even though they play little role in deciding guilt. When judges agree with the jury’s verdict, this arrangement is unproblematic; when they do not, judges are placed in a challenging predicament. Although they may take the extraordinary step of overriding the jury’s decision, this is a rare option reserved for highly exceptional circumstances. Based on interviews with 41 US judges, this study investigates whether judges, consciously or otherwise, employ more subtle means of correcting perceived guilt-phase injustices by calibrating sentence severity according to their confidence in the jury’s verdict. Judges’ rationales for doing so largely revolve around maintaining peace of mind and producing just outcomes. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Griffiths, Elizabeth |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1149381183 |0 (DE-627)1009638688 |0 (DE-576)496613464 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The British journal of criminology |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1960 |g 59(2019), 2, Seite 315-333 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271175559 |w (DE-600)1478955-3 |w (DE-576)079718906 |x 1464-3529 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:315-333 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy029 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3060713553 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1590172299 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190312152509 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190312||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Sentencing disparities | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Judicial discretion | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Juries | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Evidentiary strength | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Geschworenenprozess | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Geschworene | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Urteilsfindung | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Richter | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a g |a USA | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Problematik | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||