RT Article
T1 A comparative study of judicial control in Iran, U.S.A and Canada
A1 Jalalian, Askar
A2 Anvari, Parisa
LA English
YR 2015
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1588526941
AB Supervision and control need tools and techniques that would usually take two forms: the first form is that the same court that hears claims and complaints submitted by the departments and its agents, handles other claims and all the claims are processed by these courts of justice. Another form of judicial supervision is supervision in a dual judicial system and that is a judicial system wherein only specialized courts are competent enough to review administrative claims and to investigate the conducts of the department and its agents. In this paper, we deal with how these tools are used in advanced legal systems like the U.S., and Canada and the Iranian legal system. The result we discover in the end is that in all stages of supervision by the supervisor and the supervised, there must be a sense of accountability to people and officials and this will be achieved by transparency in performance. In the absence of transparency supervision will be disrupted and some economic and admin
CN 301
K1 Usa
K1 Kanada
K1 Recht
K1 Gericht
K1 Kontrolle
K1 Justizverwaltung
K1 Öffentliches Recht
K1 Internationales Recht
K1 Vergleich
K1 Transparenz
K1 Rechtsordnung
K1 Korruption
K1 Inspektion
DO 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.44.61