The construction of ‘So What?’ Criminology: a realist analysis

From a realist perspective there is a growing body of criminology that can be classified as ‘So What?’ criminology in that it involves a low level of theorisation, thin, inconsistent or vague concepts and categories, embodies a dubious methodology or has little or no policy relevance. The production...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthews, Roger A (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2010
In:In: Crime, Law and Social Change 54(2010), 2, Seite 125-140
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1588521648
003 DE-627
005 20210715160800.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190219s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-263205  |2 urn 
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10611-010-9249-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1588521648 
035 |a (DE-576)518521648 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ518521648 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
082 0 4 |a 301 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Matthews, Roger A  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The construction of ‘So What?’ Criminology: a realist analysis 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a From a realist perspective there is a growing body of criminology that can be classified as ‘So What?’ criminology in that it involves a low level of theorisation, thin, inconsistent or vague concepts and categories, embodies a dubious methodology or has little or no policy relevance. The production of ‘So What?’ criminology is, of course, no accident but the outcome of a number of lines of force that have served to shape the nature of mainstream academic criminology in recent years. The aim of this article is to identify some of these lines of force and to assess their impact. 
773 0 8 |i In  |a Crime, Law and Social Change  |g 54(2010), 2, Seite 125-140 
773 1 8 |g volume:54  |g year:2010  |g number:2  |g pages:125-140 
856 |u https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00615132/file/PEER_stage2_10.1007%252Fs10611-010-9249-2.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-010-9249-2  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3057957404 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1588521648 
LOK |0 005 20190326135227 
LOK |0 008 190219||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)col_collection_102140000000110 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a soar 
LOK |0 938   |l In: Crime, Law and Social Change ; 54 (2010) 2 ; 125-140  |8 0 
LOK |0 938   |l oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/26320  |8 1 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw