RT Article
T1 Ensnarement during imprisonment: re‐conceptualizing theoretically driven policies to address the association between within‐prison sanctioning and recidivism
JF Criminology & public policy
VO 17
IS 4
SP 1005
OP 1035
A1 Silver, Ian A.
A1 Nedelec, Joseph L.
LA English
YR 2018
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1586406892
AB We used data collected during the Evaluation of Ohio's Prison Programs. The analytical sample of N = 63,772 inmates represents one of the largest samples used to assess the association between within‐prison sanctioning and recidivism. Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) demonstrated that five guilty sanctioning clusters existed within the data: Persistent (0.72%), Very High Decline (0.11%), High Decline (1.38%), Moderate Decline (27.03%), and Abstainers (70.75%). The examination of sanctioning cluster classification on post‐release recidivism suggested that greater exposure to formal sanctions during imprisonment predicted recidivism 1, 2, and 3 years post‐release.
K1 Prison sanctioning
K1 Sanctioning clusters
K1 Ensnarement
K1 Inmate recidivism
K1 Rehabilitation during sanctioning
K1 Latent class growth analysis
K1 within-prison antisocial behavior
DO 10.1111/1745-9133.12397