Revisiting the role of self-control in Situational Action Theory
Wikström’s Situational Action Theory of Crime Causation (SAT) aims at providing a comprehensive account of the action-generating mechanisms that underlie rule-breaking. Paying tribute to the longstanding criminological interest in self-control, SAT also entails a new view of this concept and its rol...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| In: |
European journal of criminology
Year: 2018, Volume: 15, Issue: 1, Pages: 56-76 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1580044336 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180815084418.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180814s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1477370817732189 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1580044336 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)510044336 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510044336 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kroneberg, Clemens |d 1980- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)12863944X |0 (DE-627)635203901 |0 (DE-576)330064312 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Kroneberg, Clemens 1980- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Revisiting the role of self-control in Situational Action Theory |c Clemens Kroneberg, Sonja Schulz |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Wikström’s Situational Action Theory of Crime Causation (SAT) aims at providing a comprehensive account of the action-generating mechanisms that underlie rule-breaking. Paying tribute to the longstanding criminological interest in self-control, SAT also entails a new view of this concept and its role in crime causation. SAT claims that morality is the more fundamental determinant of rule-breaking and that self-control should become relevant only when actors enter a process of deliberation on whether or not to break a rule. Our contribution is twofold: theoretically, we discuss the role of self-control in SAT and derive previously untested implications; empirically, we evaluate these implications based on data from a large German panel study and thereby advance our understanding of when and how self-control matters for crime and delinquency. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Schulz, Sonja |d 1983- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1057900109 |0 (DE-627)795385005 |0 (DE-576)413904830 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of criminology |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2004 |g 15(2018), 1, Seite 56-76 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)379048256 |w (DE-600)2135314-1 |w (DE-576)112775543 |x 1741-2609 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:56-76 |
| 856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477370817732189 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732189 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3022360940 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1580044336 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180814164720 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180814||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Deterrence | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Dual processes | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Interactions | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Moral filter | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Morality | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
