Interoganizational utility of welfare stigma in the criminal justice system

The appropriation of “welfare stigma” or stereotypes about poor people's overreliance and abuse of public aid in two core criminal justice functions is examined: felony adjudication in a court system and space allocation in a jail. Through a comparative ethnographic study in which an abductive...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Lara-Millán, Armando (Author) ; Van Cleve, Nicole Gonzalez (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
In: Criminology
Year: 2017, Volume: 55, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-84
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1570331782
003 DE-627
005 20180306105308.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180301s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1745-9125.12128  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1570331782 
035 |a (DE-576)500331782 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ500331782 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Lara-Millán, Armando  |4 aut 
109 |a Lara-Millán, Armando 
245 1 0 |a Interoganizational utility of welfare stigma in the criminal justice system  |c Armando Lara-Millán and Nicole Gonzalez van Cleve 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The appropriation of “welfare stigma” or stereotypes about poor people's overreliance and abuse of public aid in two core criminal justice functions is examined: felony adjudication in a court system and space allocation in a jail. Through a comparative ethnographic study in which an abductive analysis of data (20 months of fieldwork) was used, we show that criminal justice gatekeepers utilize welfare stigma to create stricter eligibility criteria for due process in criminal courts and occupancy in jails. Specifically, the number of court appearances, motions, trials, jail beds, food, showers, and medical services is considered by professionals to be the benefits that individuals seek to access and abuse. Professionals view their role as preventing (rather than granting) access to these resources. The comparative nature of our data reveals that welfare stigma has interorganizational utility by serving two different organizational goals: It streamlines convictions in courts, which pulls defendants through adjudication, and conversely, it expands early release from jails, which pulls inmates out of the custody population. In the context of diminishing social safety nets, our findings have implications for understanding how discretion is exercised in an American criminal justice system increasingly tasked with the distribution of social services to the urban poor. 
700 1 |a Van Cleve, Nicole Gonzalez  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1115486160  |0 (DE-627)869813730  |0 (DE-576)477793258  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminology  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970  |g 55(2017), 1, Seite 59-84  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)340877685  |w (DE-600)2066199-X  |w (DE-576)25810161X  |x 1745-9125  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:59-84 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12128  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3001702370 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1570331782 
LOK |0 005 20180306105308 
LOK |0 008 180306||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Punishment 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Jails 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Courts 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Race 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Discretion 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Prisons 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Strafvollzug 
LOK |0 689   |a g  |a USA 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw