Individualizing risk: moral judgement, professional knowledge and affect in parole evaluations

Drawing from an ethnographic project within the California (USA) parole system, this article traces how field personnel evaluate individuals and attempt to anticipate future conduct. It troubles claims that risk has replaced dangerousness and deindividualized penal subjects. In this setting, rather...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Werther, Robert (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
In: The British journal of criminology
Jahr: 2017, Band: 57, Heft: 4, Seiten: 808-827
Online-Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1565025342
003 DE-627
005 20180731120210.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171106s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/bjc/azw025  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1565025342 
035 |a (DE-576)495025348 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ495025348 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Werther, Robert  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Individualizing risk  |b moral judgement, professional knowledge and affect in parole evaluations  |c Robert Werth 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Drawing from an ethnographic project within the California (USA) parole system, this article traces how field personnel evaluate individuals and attempt to anticipate future conduct. It troubles claims that risk has replaced dangerousness and deindividualized penal subjects. In this setting, rather than displaying a technocratic character, the evaluation of risk is highly individualizing and impressionistic. Individuals contingently assemble knowledges, devalue actuarial tools and privilege their experiential expertise, affect and the moral judgement of personhood. Even among those classified as ‘serious’ offenders, evaluation operates as a space for judging the potential danger of specific individuals. This is reflective, in part, of field personnel’s efforts to protect their professional standing in the face of the parole agency’s promotion of risk technologies. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1960  |g 57(2017), 4, Seite 808-827  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271175559  |w (DE-600)1478955-3  |w (DE-576)079718906  |x 1464-3529  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:57  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g pages:808-827 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw025  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2986433510 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1565025342 
LOK |0 005 20171106152535 
LOK |0 008 171106||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Risk 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Parole 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Punishment 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Assessment 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Prisoner re-entry 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Risiko 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Gefährlickeit 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw