‘Don’t Blow Your Cool’: Provocation, Violent Coping, and the Conditioning Effects of Self-Control
Objectives General Strain Theory (Agnew in Criminology 30:47–87, 1992 ) has received broad empirical support, but little is known about moderators of the strain-delinquency relationship. This study tests whether self-control attenuates the relationship between a certain type of delinquency—violence—...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
2016
|
In: |
Journal of quantitative criminology
Jahr: 2016, Band: 32, Heft: 4, Seiten: 561-587 |
Online-Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Schlagwörter: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1559004185 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20170526093557.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170526s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10940-015-9267-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1559004185 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)489004180 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ489004180 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schulz, Sonja |d 1983- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1057900109 |0 (DE-627)795385005 |0 (DE-576)413904830 |4 aut | |
109 | |a Schulz, Sonja 1983- |a Schulz, S. 1983- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘Don’t Blow Your Cool’: Provocation, Violent Coping, and the Conditioning Effects of Self-Control |c Sonja Schulz |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Objectives General Strain Theory (Agnew in Criminology 30:47–87, 1992 ) has received broad empirical support, but little is known about moderators of the strain-delinquency relationship. This study tests whether self-control attenuates the relationship between a certain type of delinquency—violence—and its most important precursor, considered a type of strain: interpersonal provocation. This study compares the conditioning effects of risk-affinity and self-control/impulsivity on the provocation-violence link, since recent work suggests differentiating between both characteristics. Methods The provocation-violence link is examined (1) using a scenario design with randomly varied degrees of objective provocation and a measure of projected violence, and (2) with measures of self-reported past violence and subjective sensitivity to provocation. The analyses are based on a large sample of seventh-graders (n = 2635) from five cities in Western Germany, interviewed in 2013. Linear probability models regressing violence measures on personal traits, provocation measures, and their interactions are estimated. Results Both self-control and risk-affinity moderate the relationship between subjective sensitivity to provocation and past violent behavior. Students with high self-control are able to control their anger and do not turn violent, even when they feel provoked easily. However, only risk-affinity significantly amplifies the effect of objective provocation on prospective violence when simultaneously controlling for the conditioning effect of self-control. Conclusions Findings underscore that both self-control and risk-aversion are important coping resources. This study highlights the importance of using internally consistent and mechanism-congruent measures in the study of illicit coping processes and conditioning factors and discourages from using composite, potentially multidimensional measures. | ||
650 | 4 | |a General Strain Theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Individual differences | |
650 | 4 | |a Violence | |
650 | 4 | |a Provocation | |
650 | 4 | |a Self-control | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of quantitative criminology |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1985 |g 32(2016), 4, Seite 561-587 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320578003 |w (DE-600)2017241-2 |w (DE-576)104082321 |x 1573-7799 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:561-587 |
856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10940-015-9267-4.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9267-4 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mkri | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2970238128 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1559004185 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170526093557 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170526||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Self-control theory | ||
LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Provocation | ||
LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Violence | ||
LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Individual differences | ||
LOK | |0 689 |a s |a General Strain theory | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a krub | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3957449405 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1559004185 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210725061642 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210725||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-24#49F86B0AB86E9104597F3516F60F305314C07389 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |