‘Don’t Blow Your Cool’: Provocation, Violent Coping, and the Conditioning Effects of Self-Control
Objectives General Strain Theory (Agnew in Criminology 30:47–87, 1992 ) has received broad empirical support, but little is known about moderators of the strain-delinquency relationship. This study tests whether self-control attenuates the relationship between a certain type of delinquency—violence—...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| In: |
Journal of quantitative criminology
Year: 2016, Volume: 32, Issue: 4, Pages: 561-587 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1559004185 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20170526093557.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170526s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10940-015-9267-4 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1559004185 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)489004180 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ489004180 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Schulz, Sonja |d 1983- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1057900109 |0 (DE-627)795385005 |0 (DE-576)413904830 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Schulz, Sonja 1983- |a Schulz, S. 1983- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘Don’t Blow Your Cool’: Provocation, Violent Coping, and the Conditioning Effects of Self-Control |c Sonja Schulz |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives General Strain Theory (Agnew in Criminology 30:47–87, 1992 ) has received broad empirical support, but little is known about moderators of the strain-delinquency relationship. This study tests whether self-control attenuates the relationship between a certain type of delinquency—violence—and its most important precursor, considered a type of strain: interpersonal provocation. This study compares the conditioning effects of risk-affinity and self-control/impulsivity on the provocation-violence link, since recent work suggests differentiating between both characteristics. Methods The provocation-violence link is examined (1) using a scenario design with randomly varied degrees of objective provocation and a measure of projected violence, and (2) with measures of self-reported past violence and subjective sensitivity to provocation. The analyses are based on a large sample of seventh-graders (n = 2635) from five cities in Western Germany, interviewed in 2013. Linear probability models regressing violence measures on personal traits, provocation measures, and their interactions are estimated. Results Both self-control and risk-affinity moderate the relationship between subjective sensitivity to provocation and past violent behavior. Students with high self-control are able to control their anger and do not turn violent, even when they feel provoked easily. However, only risk-affinity significantly amplifies the effect of objective provocation on prospective violence when simultaneously controlling for the conditioning effect of self-control. Conclusions Findings underscore that both self-control and risk-aversion are important coping resources. This study highlights the importance of using internally consistent and mechanism-congruent measures in the study of illicit coping processes and conditioning factors and discourages from using composite, potentially multidimensional measures. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a General Strain Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Individual differences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Violence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Provocation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-control | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of quantitative criminology |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1985 |g 32(2016), 4, Seite 561-587 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320578003 |w (DE-600)2017241-2 |w (DE-576)104082321 |x 1573-7799 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:561-587 |
| 856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10940-015-9267-4.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9267-4 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 32 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 561-587 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2970238128 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1559004185 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170526093557 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170526||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Self-control theory | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Provocation | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Violence | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Individual differences | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a General Strain theory | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3957449405 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1559004185 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210725061642 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210725||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-24#49F86B0AB86E9104597F3516F60F305314C07389 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||