The sentencing practice of international criminal tribunals: ordinary sentences for extraordinary crimes

In comparison to sentences meted out by international tribunals at Nuremberg, Tokyo and Arusha, and by domestic courts, sentences handed down at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) have been inexplicably lenient. Factors that may have contributed to the high proporti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Harmon, Mark B. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Gaynor, Fergal
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: [S.l.] SSRN [2010]
In: Journal of international criminal justice
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 152613439X
003 DE-627
005 20220604105515.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 160223s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)152613439X 
035 |a (DE-576)456134395 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456134395 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Harmon, Mark B.  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The sentencing practice of international criminal tribunals  |b ordinary sentences for extraordinary crimes  |c Mark B. Harmon and Fergal Gaynor 
264 1 |a [S.l.]  |b SSRN  |c [2010] 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In comparison to sentences meted out by international tribunals at Nuremberg, Tokyo and Arusha, and by domestic courts, sentences handed down at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) have been inexplicably lenient. Factors that may have contributed to the high proportion of low sentences at the ICTY include undue emphasis on mitigating factors, particularly those of particular importance to the Tribunal, the use of plea agreements, the absence of a separate sentencing hearing following conviction and the practice of using global (rather than separate) sentences. To make sentences more proportionate to the crimes committed, the objectives of sentencing should be clarified and re-evaluated. Greater weight should be given to deterrence. In assessing the gravity of the offence, the quantum of harm caused to and suffering experienced by direct and indirect victims of the crime merits more detailed evaluation. The importance of mitigating circumstances (such as combating historical revisionism, pleading guilty, expressing remorse and voluntary surrender) should continue to be fully recognized but those factors should not attract excessive weight. Plea bargaining and plea agreements should be encouraged because they are indispensable to the Tribunal, an institution with significant temporal, practical and resource limitations. The sentencing process should take place after conviction. A sentencing Chamber should be obliged to state the starting point of the sentence which it deems appropriate and then quantify the discounts it gives to each mitigating factor. Greater consideration should be given to imposing consecutive rather than concurrent sentences. The decision not to adopt sentencing guidelines represents a missed opportunity 
700 1 |a Gaynor, Fergal  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of international criminal justice  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2003  |g 5(2007), 3, Seite 683-712  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)363757368  |w (DE-600)2106537-8  |w (DE-576)110736575  |x 1478-1395  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2007  |g number:3  |g pages:683-712 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm025  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2007  |e 3  |h 683-712 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2899647822 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 152613439X 
LOK |0 005 20160223101813 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw