What the ICJ did not say about the duty to punish genocide: the missing pieces in a puzzle

The article focuses on the legal implications of the construction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ or the Court) of the duty to punish genocide under Article VI of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ben-Naftali, Orna (Autor)
Otros Autores: Sharon, Miri
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: [S.l.] SSRN [2010]
En: Journal of international criminal justice
Año: 2007, Volumen: 5, Número: 4, Páginas: 859-874
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1526133431
003 DE-627
005 20220604105509.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 160223s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1526133431 
035 |a (DE-576)456133437 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456133437 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ben-Naftali, Orna  |0 (DE-627)1259266575  |0 (DE-576)189266570  |4 aut 
109 |a Ben-Naftali, Orna  |a Naftali, Orna Ben-  |a Ben-Naftali, Ornah 
245 1 0 |a What the ICJ did not say about the duty to punish genocide  |b the missing pieces in a puzzle  |c Orna Ben-Naftali and Miri Sharon 
264 1 |a [S.l.]  |b SSRN  |c [2010] 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The article focuses on the legal implications of the construction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ or the Court) of the duty to punish genocide under Article VI of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro judgment. It posits that the Court's discussion of the duty to punish is satisfying in terms of what it says and less satisfying in terms of what it is silent about. It is satisfying in the sense that the Court's construction of the duty to cooperate with international tribunals prosecuting genocide as including a duty of extradition, seems to extend beyond the plain language of the Convention and indeed beyond the parties original intent. It is not fully satisfying because the duty to prosecute remains quite limited. It is further argued that the obligation to punish genocide as established in Article I and the obligation to prosecute genocide as established in Article VI should be understood as two distinct obligations. Article VI merely sets the institutional arrangements for prosecution. Other normative sources support the conclusion that a general duty to prosecute perpetrators of genocide or extradite them for prosecution elsewhere applies even in those cases where the offence was not committed in the territory of a contracting state or when the offender is prosecuted by an international court that has jurisdiction over the state where the alleged perpetrator is found 
700 1 |a Sharon, Miri  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of international criminal justice  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2003  |g 5(2007), 4, Seite 859-874  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)363757368  |w (DE-600)2106537-8  |w (DE-576)110736575  |x 1478-1395  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2007  |g number:4  |g pages:859-874 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm041  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2007  |e 4  |h 859-874 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2899646834 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1526133431 
LOK |0 005 20160223101807 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw