Superior responsibility under article 28 ICC statute: for what exactly is the superior held responsible?

Superior responsibility is a concept for attributing criminal liability to military commanders and other superiors that is employed with some frequency in the ad hoc international criminal tribunals. Nevertheless, it remains unclear for what the superior is actually blamed. The author argues that wi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nerlich, Volker (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] SSRN [2010]
In: Journal of international criminal justice
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1526132931
003 DE-627
005 20220604105506.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 160223s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1526132931 
035 |a (DE-576)456132937 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456132937 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Nerlich, Volker  |d 1972-  |0 (DE-588)1153352435  |0 (DE-627)1014744024  |0 (DE-576)185178464  |4 aut 
109 |a Nerlich, Volker 1972- 
245 1 0 |a Superior responsibility under article 28 ICC statute  |b for what exactly is the superior held responsible?  |c Volker Nerlich 
264 1 |a [S.l.]  |b SSRN  |c [2010] 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Superior responsibility is a concept for attributing criminal liability to military commanders and other superiors that is employed with some frequency in the ad hoc international criminal tribunals. Nevertheless, it remains unclear for what the superior is actually blamed. The author argues that with respect to superior responsibility as construed in Article 28 ICC Statute the answer to this question depends on the form of superior responsibility for which the accused is found guilty. If the superior is held responsible for not having prevented or repressed the subordinate's crime even though the superior knew of the crime, he or she can be blamed for both, the criminal conduct of the subordinate and the wrongful consequence caused by it. For all other forms of superior responsibility, the superior can only be blamed for his or her failure to exercise control properly, which resulted in a wrongful consequence, but not for the criminal conduct of the subordinate 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of international criminal justice  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2003  |g 5(2007), 3, Seite 665-682  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)363757368  |w (DE-600)2106537-8  |w (DE-576)110736575  |x 1478-1395  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2007  |g number:3  |g pages:665-682 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm033  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2007  |e 3  |h 665-682 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2899646338 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1526132931 
LOK |0 005 20160223101803 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw