Developments in US anti-terrorism law: checks and balances undermined

The thesis of this update on developments in US anti-terrorism law since 9/11 is that the system of checks and balances among the several branches of the government, executive, judicial and legislative, has been undermined by the deferral and avoidance of key decisions by each of the branches and th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abrams, Norman (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] SSRN [2012]
In: Journal of international criminal justice
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1526130653
003 DE-627
005 20220604105452.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 160223s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1526130653 
035 |a (DE-576)456130659 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456130659 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Abrams, Norman  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Developments in US anti-terrorism law  |b checks and balances undermined  |c Norman Abrams 
264 1 |a [S.l.]  |b SSRN  |c [2012] 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The thesis of this update on developments in US anti-terrorism law since 9/11 is that the system of checks and balances among the several branches of the government, executive, judicial and legislative, has been undermined by the deferral and avoidance of key decisions by each of the branches and the withdrawal of authority by one branch from another. Examples are drawn from four Supreme Court decisions handed down since 9/11; the use of sunset clauses in the USA PATRIOT Act; the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005; the use of torture in interrogating suspected terrorists; National Security Agency electronic surveillance; extraordinary renditions of suspected terrorists; and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of international criminal justice  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2003  |g 4(2006), 5, Seite 1117-1136  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)363757368  |w (DE-600)2106537-8  |w (DE-576)110736575  |x 1478-1395  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:4  |g year:2006  |g number:5  |g pages:1117-1136 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql080  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 4  |j 2006  |e 5  |h 1117-1136 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2899644033 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1526130653 
LOK |0 005 20160223101746 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw